<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>flylyf - Latest Comments in The Hamilton ODC X-02 Quartz</title><link>http://flylyf.disqus.com/</link><description>None</description><atom:link href="https://flylyf.disqus.com/the_hamilton_odc_x_02_quartz/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 23:30:41 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Hamilton ODC X-02 Quartz</title><link>http://www.flylyf.com/the-hamilton-odc-x-02-quartz/#comment-305590868</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Forget it, if it was mechanical instead of Quartz you would have a winner,&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cshepley</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 23:30:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Hamilton ODC X-02 Quartz</title><link>http://www.flylyf.com/the-hamilton-odc-x-02-quartz/#comment-11113373</link><description>&lt;p&gt;these multiple clock faces seem kind of useless without date and and Am/Pm to accompany each time zone&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">john</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 14:33:22 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>